Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 18, 2019 2:20:45 GMT
How great! One phrase that struck me and stuck with me during the past year is "insisting on giving help that is not asked for is a power play". Can't remember who said this, but this is a really simple mantra to anchor the self to not control situation through manipulative niceness, and it has definitely shown me how some people appear nice but uses trustworthiness and niceness as a currency for politics.
|
|
|
Post by alexandra on Nov 18, 2019 3:54:17 GMT
How great! One phrase that struck me and stuck with me during the past year is "insisting on giving help that is not asked for is a power play". Can't remember who said this, but this is a really simple mantra to anchor the self to not control situation through manipulative niceness, and it has definitely shown me how some people appear nice but uses trustworthiness and niceness as a currency for politics. I once worked with someone who did this in a way that really creeped me out. No boundaries in trying to force you to accept help you didn't ask for. Seemed like he wanted you both to like and owe him in return. All my spidey senses tingled. He's in jail now. He was clinically a sociopath (I'd imagine antisocial personality disorder?), and it turned out he had done heinous things far beyond what I could have imagined, even with the run-away-bad-vibes! I got from him solely based on exactly what your quote says.
|
|
|
Post by serenity on Nov 18, 2019 22:14:42 GMT
Last week I have been reading a book that really resonates with me. It is Women Who Love Too Much by Robin Norwood. In an earlier post I described my focus on the FA man as an addiction. And this book really grabs this perspective. The author compares relationship addicts with alcoholics: Oh wow, I hadn't heard of this book in a long time. Just a small caution, this book was published in 1985, when misogynism in self-help books and the economic and social power differentials between men and women was still extremely high. Its been widely criticised...for the premise of comparing substance addiction to a woman's legitimate need for relational security and love, for failing to acknowledge power differentials between men and women which might lead to a woman's need to control her family's economic wellbeing through her male partner, and for the assumption that a `bad partner' means a woman is emotionally incompetent, intimacy-avoidant etc. The `women shouldn't seek to have control in relationships' is a sticky issue. In 1985, it was usual for men to have most (or all) of the financial and social control, gifted to them via male privilege. Women `controlled' their families financial wellbeing by creating secure relationship's with men. Now getting back to modern times, and whether suggesting to an avoidant partner to get therapy to make the relationship work is overly controlling... I'm going to say its perfectly legitimate to attempt to create a stable relationship with any person you see fit. If therapy is what it would take, its fine to suggest it. If they say no, then you have to respect that and make choices. Does having chemistry with an avoidant partner who resembles your unavailable parent make you intimacy avoidant? I'm going to say in your case Bohemian, `No'. You had a long secure marriage, so you have what it takes to attract and keep a man who is good for you. However without awareness of how you are prone to experiencing strong sexual chemistry with parental-like figures, you were caught unaware, and confused.
|
|
|
Post by iz42 on Nov 18, 2019 23:10:10 GMT
thanks for this disclaimer serenity. I had an immediate reaction to the title and I didn't realize that the book was originally published in 1985. I looked it up on amazon and saw almost exclusively positive reviews.
|
|
|
Post by serenity on Nov 19, 2019 2:35:14 GMT
Its good that some people resonate with it and that they feel it helps. I mean there are definitely excessively passive-aggressively controlling people out there who could benefit from checking themselves.
I just don't think Bohemianrasberry was excessively controlling when she suggested her avoidant friend get some help with his mental health issues. She was respectful, mentioned it only once, and gave good reasons.
The book itself seems to be a kind of red herring in this case, because she already has the capacity for secure attachment in long term relationships. She doesn't need to change her `character problems' or work on herself to improve the relationship. IMHO She needs to know that she is vulnerable to choosing unavailable men because of her upbringing, and to look for an available partner again. It can help to have therapeutic support to make sure she makes good decisions in future, instead of setting herself up for failure again.
I'm going to guess the list of undesirable character traits in that pic under `Relationally addictive women' would disappear if she simply chose an available partner again, like she did before.
(lol, sorry to talk about you in the third person Bohemianrasberry)
|
|
|
Post by bohemianraspberry on Nov 19, 2019 5:47:51 GMT
serenity, thank you for seeing me as the secure person I feel like. This book is old, but it is not about traditional gender roles or that the woman should not have equal power as the man. It is more about not giving advices that wasn't asked for, that can feel like contol or manipulation on the receiving end. And maybe uncounscious it is. My FA's remark about me making him my project woke me up. It wasn't my suggestion about a therapist that triggered him to say it, but because when we talked about relationship I talked most about his issues, and not so much addressing mine (I did in the last meeting, though). He said earlier: "You can read about this stuff, but you don't have to tell me about it. When women start analyzing me and start telling me who I am and what I think, I quit." Of course, as an FA, he is overly sensitive to critique and judgement as well. But noone likes being told who they are. I have used an unbalanced approach, that I see is some kind of control behavior to get him into a relationship he might not be ready for. I can relax now, and just see what he choose to do, let it develop organically. If you love somebody, set them free. If he is ready, he will come.
|
|
|
Post by alexandra on Nov 19, 2019 5:50:59 GMT
He said earlier: "You can read about this stuff, but you don't have to tell me about it. When women start analyzing me and start telling me who I am and what I think, I quit."
Very telling. Sounds like this has happened to him before! I wonder why
|
|
|
Post by serenity on Nov 19, 2019 9:34:46 GMT
It is more about not giving advices that wasn't asked for, that can feel like contol or manipulation on the receiving end. And maybe uncounscious it is. My FA's remark about me making him my project woke me up. It wasn't my suggestion about a therapist that triggered him to say it, but because when we talked about relationship I talked most about his issues, and not so much addressing mine (I did in the last meeting, though). He said earlier: "You can read about this stuff, but you don't have to tell me about it. When women start analyzing me and start telling me who I am and what I think, I quit." Of course, as an FA, he is overly sensitive to critique and judgement as well. But noone likes being told who they are. I have used an unbalanced approach, that I see is some kind of control behavior to get him into a relationship he might not be ready for. I can relax now, and just see what he choose to do, let it develop organically. If you love somebody, set them free. If he is ready, he will come. I see it as you expressing a boundary, then explaining the issues specifically. He may not have liked the boundary or hearing the issues, but consider that the man has a history with you of flakiness, unavailability and outright cheating/replacing you. That behaviour is serious enough to warrant some statement about your boundaries, and an explanation. And wishing to stay just friends with an avoidant who is not actively seeking self awareness is a good one! I kinda agree that the psychobabble is uneccessary and a bit obnoxious so early on. You would usually only need to explain what your boundaries are, if something romantic looked like it was on the cards IMO. But you still got your point across, which is fine. A lot of people talk about deal breakers on dating profiles and first dates, so its not abnormal at all. Its helps prevent wasting a lot of time. Its understandable that you feel nervous because he has not received your boundary and explanation well. But renegging your boundaries and looking for reasons to call yourself too controlling/too this/too that sounds like normal anxious behaviour to me (been there). Boundaries are hard to set, the consequences can be hard to face too. They are there to protect you though. You really don't need to go through a repeat of some of what he's done to you before IMO.
|
|
|
Post by bohemianraspberry on Nov 19, 2019 14:46:25 GMT
However without awareness of how you are prone to experiencing strong sexual chemistry with parental-like figures, you were caught unaware, and confused. Ouch! That was a though one... Yes, I feel strong sexual desire for this man. And yes, he reminds me of my father in many ways. But I haven't thought about these two parameters in the same sentence before. It feels incestous and disgusting, and I don't like to think about it. Aren't we all choosing partners that seems familiar in some way, that reminds us of our opposite-sex parent? Or so I have read.
|
|
|
Post by bohemianraspberry on Nov 19, 2019 14:56:58 GMT
Sounds like this has happened to him before! I wonder why Yes, right, lol. He also said that I am the one who have come furthest... It remains to see if this means closest to a relationship or longest before he runs
|
|
|
Post by serenity on Nov 19, 2019 21:36:14 GMT
However without awareness of how you are prone to experiencing strong sexual chemistry with parental-like figures, you were caught unaware, and confused. Ouch! That was a though one... Yes, I feel strong sexual desire for this man. And yes, he reminds me of my father in many ways. But I haven't thought about these two parameters in the same sentence before. It feels incestous and disgusting, and I don't like to think about it. Aren't we all choosing partners that seems familiar in some way, that reminds us of our opposite-sex parent? Or so I have read. Lul. No I'm not saying you like your Dad that way haha <3 Think of it more like `emotional chemistry' , that we develop with childhood caregivers, because of familiarity, dependence, combined with being groomed throughout childhood to cater to that personality type. Its most definitely not the only type of romantic figure you can pick, especially if you choose consciously.
|
|
|
Post by alexandra on Nov 19, 2019 21:42:38 GMT
Aren't we all choosing partners that seems familiar in some way, that reminds us of our opposite-sex parent? Or so I have read. It's not always opposite-sex, and it may be another close adult who wasn't the parent. Like if a daughter is enmeshed by her mother, she may find male partners who personality-wise are similar to mom, as that's both what's familiar and what subconsciously seeks repetition and healing.
|
|
|
Post by bohemianraspberry on Nov 22, 2019 18:22:17 GMT
I think I am hitting rock bottom here. No big crisis or meltdown, but more a quiet grief over letting go. These last two days I have not been at work, I feel too stressed, and I recognise it is not only work-related stress. I cannot be in this undefined relationship anymore. It shouldn't be that hard. It should be fun, happy and easy. I turn to books, like I always do. I lay on my sofa and read the book Mr Unavailable and the Fallback Girl: The Definitive Guide to Understanding Emotionally Unavailable Men and the Women that Love Them by Natalie Lue. When I realized he was FA, I always had hope that he could be ready for a relationship if I just were patient, understanding, calm, consistent and loving. It took a while to understand that this is not enough for an emotionally unavailable man. Even if he loves me. Because he have to be ready and willing to work on himself to be ready for a relationship with anyone. You guys in this forum have been telling me that, and I have finally been able to admit that this is true. An unavailable man have to choose, freely and consciously, to change his behavior. It has been 8 days since I heard from him. It is his "turn" to initiate contact. Because I made it clear that I want a serious relationship and are awaiting to see what he choose to do, I will not reach out before he does. Not to play games, but because it feels authentic. Either he is processing what to do, or he has moved on without telling me, or maybe he is just too busy. What I think about now is what will happen when he realize he is about to lose me. I guess he would panic and start contacting me. What worries me is that I don't know what would be enough amount of effort from his side to show a real change. I am afraid it only would be "blowing hot" to keep me hanging in there. I guess I just have to wait and see what happens. I think I will answer a text with an encourage to call me instead. I need to see a real improvement and progression, but I don't know how to define what that implies. I start to feel ready to move on without him. It is sad, because I felt we had something special. I also feel kind of a fool who have been waiting around, doing all the work, when he has given almost nothing. But at least I have grown and know myself better now.
|
|
|
Post by kittygirl on Nov 22, 2019 19:30:46 GMT
@bohemianraspberry I feel you on this on so many levels. I do.
For what it's worth (and if this helps you to feel stronger in your decision to move on) one my best friends is a therapist who works with both attachment issues and Complex PTSD (and other trauma related issues) and she told me it takes *years* of work for people to get to the place you desire (a consistent, defined relationship) and that is when they are coming to see her every single week and putting in the very hard, day to day work on their own (there are amazingly strong insecure attachment folks in this forum who are putting in that work and can attest to how long it takes and how devoted they are to making progress). As she told me "It's excruciatingly slow progress". In fact, I recently listened to an EXCELLENT podcast (i listened to the episode on disorganized attachment specifically but it's an entire series all on attachment and is extremely well done...i can link it if people are interested) and they said that because disorganized attachment is so chaotic for the sufferer, the new approach in therapy can just be to get them to initially move towards an organized (but still insecure) style, like DA. That at least then, it's organized for the patient themselves. And that's before they ever even get towards trying to earn secure.
If he does start to contact you with more fervor, I guess I don't think of it as him "blowing hot" to try to "keep you hanging in there" but rather as a symptom of this very real and serious issue he has (and I don't say that in ANY way to disparage other FAs on the boards or DAs or whoever...this is the type of language my own FA friend uses when he describes his attachment issues. They cause him to feel like an alien and create tremendous pain for him and those around him). For the FA in my life (and I suspect yours also) he rarely (if ever) sits in a peaceful "middle" but rather bounces back and forth between the extremes of fear (engulfment and then abandonment and then engulfment again) and that is regardless of how "patient, understanding, calm consistent and loving" I am, or his ex wife was, or the relationships before that...you see my point. And one of the things I have come to realize is just how integral *I* am, as a owner and orchestrator of my own pain in this dynamic. "One man does not make a team" and all that.
I am glad you feel ready to move on without him. No matter what, it's nice to know the people here understand the pain these dynamics cause (regardless of which side of the equations they have been on).
|
|
|
Post by bohemianraspberry on Nov 25, 2019 19:22:16 GMT
On my way to healing, these last days I have done this to focus on myself: - Went to the swimming hall and enjoyed the thermal pool and jacuzzi - Had some friends over for red wine and and food, and talked for hours about all other stuff than men - Talked to a close friend who know the whole story, she was honest and direct with me about how this man is not showing up and I can do better, cried a bit with her - Took a long drive to another city, bought myself dinner on the local café - In the car on my way home, all the radio songs fitted, I cried to Meatloaf's Two of of three ain't bad (I usually don't cry a lot) - Booked an hour with a psychologist (was lucky and got an appointment for tomorrow already) - Registered at a dating site, for the first time in 17 years, just to let myself see that there are other options, and maybe get some awaited attention too FA and I have not contacted each other for 1,5 week. It is the longest period without texting since I got single. I think I am doing good. Although I know I am not totally ready to let him go. I keep thinking that he needs time. FA's do need to take things slow, don't they? He is scared of abandonment, he is expecting that, I wish to give us a chance now that we have started to get more direct. And we are long distance so maybe that takes even longer time. I am probably crazy for thinking this, but I will leave that to the psychologist.
|
|