|
Post by alexandra on Sept 3, 2018 7:02:05 GMT
epicgum, it sounds to me like her complaining was bids for validation from you. If she wasn't actually taking any real action to address her weight if it was bothering her, while wanting you to reassure her, that is her dysfunctional AP behavior coming out. It's not surprising it contributed to putting a wedge between the two of you. You've taken on a lot of the blame in this situation in your different threads. Take responsibility where it is properly due (nitpicking as a distancing technique is painful for both partners), but I don't remember seeing if you've mentioned that she was doing any self-work on her AP style?
|
|
|
Post by epicgum on Sept 3, 2018 15:45:44 GMT
epicgum, it sounds to me like her complaining was bids for validation from you. If she wasn't actually taking any real action to address her weight if it was bothering her, while wanting you to reassure her, that is her dysfunctional AP behavior coming out. It's not surprising it contributed to putting a wedge between the two of you. You've taken on a lot of the blame in this situation in your different threads. Take responsibility where it is properly due (nitpicking as a distancing technique is painful for both partners), but I don't remember seeing if you've mentioned that she was doing any self-work on her AP style? Ok, yeah that makes sense. I know I'm a bit of a broken record on this. In this context I was asking mostly for myself to try to understand whether a little but of the AP within myself was influencing this as I CAN be a bit of a people pleaser and let other people's values influence me. No, she wasn't doing any "work" on herself, but neither of us really knew about attachment theory sadly. (I'd read the first two chapters of "attached" and then binned it and forgot about it when I got to the part that said DAs were horrid people :/ )
|
|
|
Post by alexandra on Sept 3, 2018 17:28:57 GMT
epicgum, you're not being a broken record. You're processing. I'm pointing out that the breakup wasn't all your fault and, while you should take responsibility for your piece, she also has responsibility and an insecure attachment style that she would need to work on as well. I'm not sure that splitting up your DA and AP tendencies and considering them separately is as helpful as looking at FA as its own set of behaviors. FA people-pleasing is actually different than AP behavior and has a different root cause. I'm going to go into detail on both, and it's going to get long. AP is more about not being able to communicate needs because confidence is so lacking and partner is "better" than self, so partner should always be prioritized. AP is scared to communicate needs, because they don't have the confidence to, and are willing to push aside their needs for the "greater" purpose of propping up their partner. But this is sincere out of lack of self esteem that they don't matter as much as others, and because they were probably used to getting the best response from an adult caretaker when they were younger by displaying this behavior (APs got inconsistent attention from caretakers, blamed themselves for it, and tried to guess which of their behaviors as a child influenced the caretaker to meet their needs, then carry that illusion of control over others into adulthood). This is also why strict AP never fixates on qualities to devalue or question their partners in their head... they are looking to the partner to create meaning and sense of self for them because they lack the confidence to manage it on their own, so you'd always want to keep your partner on a pedestal because then this great person thinks you're worthy and defines you, too. Unfortunately, it will never be enough to fill the AP's holes because they need to be able to do it themselves and make themselves happy first, so relationship problems and eventually some manipulation (Google protest behaviors) are likely to follow if the AP doesn't work on healing. My understanding of this for FA is, at some point in their lives, their needs were not only met inconsistently if at all, but there appeared to be no rhyme or reason to it. Disorganized. The child could not find patterns of behavior that worked to influence the outcome and as a result felt they must be terrible and unworthy of having needs met (low opinion of self) and eventually scared of the unpredictable responses of the adult caretaker that they still had to rely on and wanted to attach to (low opinion of others, can't trust their intentions). The nervous system ends up being negatively activated if the attachment figure gets too close (pain from the caretaker being in their space but not meeting their needs) or too far (anxiety because the child has no confidence in their ability to meet their own needs). As a result, and since there was no positivity to build on, the child might reject themselves and build a people-pleasing persona to get attention and to survive, because they're scared that their "real" selves are not good enough and inevitably are going to be rejected. The projected personality both has aspects that seem to get them a more positive response from others, which is validating (the more you idealize your partner, the better the validation like with AP -- validation you don't know how to give yourself), and saves them from feeling rejection of their TRUE self, if rejection happens. But underneath that people pleasing persona is still a lot of distrust, so a distancing behavior to fully protect the FA as an adult might be to nitpick and question their partner. The FA still believes the partner could abandon them at any moment like happened in their childhood, which is frightening. In addition, all these subconscious layers make the FA disconnected from understanding their true feelings and motivations behind actions, so there may be a feeling of chronic dissatisfaction that they don't understand at all. Sometimes, blame for those misunderstood feelings can land on the romantic partner even when they have nothing to do with it, which breeds resentment and more devaluing.
|
|
|
Post by epicgum on Sept 4, 2018 18:09:08 GMT
epicgum, you're not being a broken record. You're processing. I'm pointing out that the breakup wasn't all your fault and, while you should take responsibility for your piece, she also has responsibility and an insecure attachment style that she would need to work on as well. I'm not sure that splitting up your DA and AP tendencies and considering them separately is as helpful as looking at FA as its own set of behaviors. FA people-pleasing is actually different than AP behavior and has a different root cause. I'm going to go into detail on both, and it's going to get long. AP is more about not being able to communicate needs because confidence is so lacking and partner is "better" than self, so partner should always be prioritized. AP is scared to communicate needs, because they don't have the confidence to, and are willing to push aside their needs for the "greater" purpose of propping up their partner. But this is sincere out of lack of self esteem that they don't matter as much as others, and because they were probably used to getting the best response from an adult caretaker when they were younger by displaying this behavior (APs got inconsistent attention from caretakers, blamed themselves for it, and tried to guess which of their behaviors as a child influenced the caretaker to meet their needs, then carry that illusion of control over others into adulthood). This is also why strict AP never fixates on qualities to devalue or question their partners in their head... they are looking to the partner to create meaning and sense of self for them because they lack the confidence to manage it on their own, so you'd always want to keep your partner on a pedestal because then this great person thinks you're worthy and defines you, too. Unfortunately, it will never be enough to fill the AP's holes because they need to be able to do it themselves and make themselves happy first, so relationship problems and eventually some manipulation (Google protest behaviors) are likely to follow if the AP doesn't work on healing. My understanding of this for FA is, at some point in their lives, their needs were not only met inconsistently if at all, but there appeared to be no rhyme or reason to it. Disorganized. The child could not find patterns of behavior that worked to influence the outcome and as a result felt they must be terrible and unworthy of having needs met (low opinion of self) and eventually scared of the unpredictable responses of the adult caretaker that they still had to rely on and wanted to attach to (low opinion of others, can't trust their intentions). The nervous system ends up being negatively activated if the attachment figure gets too close (pain from the caretaker being in their space but not meeting their needs) or too far (anxiety because the child has no confidence in their ability to meet their own needs). As a result, and since there was no positivity to build on, the child might reject themselves and build a people-pleasing persona to get attention and to survive, because they're scared that their "real" selves are not good enough and inevitably are going to be rejected. The projected personality both has aspects that seem to get them a more positive response from others, which is validating (the more you idealize your partner, the better the validation like with AP -- validation you don't know how to give yourself), and saves them from feeling rejection of their TRUE self, if rejection happens. But underneath that people pleasing persona is still a lot of distrust, so a distancing behavior to fully protect the FA as an adult might be to nitpick and question their partner. The FA still believes the partner could abandon them at any moment like happened in their childhood, which is frightening. In addition, all these subconscious layers make the FA disconnected from understanding their true feelings and motivations behind actions, so there may be a feeling of chronic dissatisfaction that they don't understand at all. Sometimes, blame for those misunderstood feelings can land on the romantic partner even when they have nothing to do with it, which breeds resentment and more devaluing. Thanks for this long post. Its amazing how well this resonates with me.
|
|
|
Post by leavethelighton on Sept 4, 2018 23:50:56 GMT
You'll be fascinated to hear that, as a fearful avoidant, when I was in a relationship--i hated puppies, now that I'm broken up, I adore them.
Interesting. I used to dislike being around other people's kids and wouldn't hold babies.
I feel mostly the opposite now (well now that my kids are into kid stage I'm okay with not holding the nearest baby, but I don't dislike it if I end up doing it). It helps that I had my own kids, but I think there may be attachment issues at play. I didn't have any more emotional vulnerability left to give. There are a lot of things I avoided and still sometimes (funerals, weddings, holding babies, etc. unless we were biologically related) without really understanding why I went out of my way to avoid them, that I realize are symbolic points of emotional vulnerability in our society. Now I feel a lot more favorable about things like baby showers, weddings, etc.
On the other hand, I used to love pets and now I'm kind of....over them. It may be that parenting just takes too much of my introvert energy though and have nothing to do with attachment style.
|
|
|
Post by epicgum on Sept 5, 2018 0:42:01 GMT
You'll be fascinated to hear that, as a fearful avoidant, when I was in a relationship--i hated puppies, now that I'm broken up, I adore them.
Interesting. I used to dislike being around other people's kids and wouldn't hold babies.
I feel mostly the opposite now (well now that my kids are into kid stage I'm okay with not holding the nearest baby, but I don't dislike it if I end up doing it). It helps that I had my own kids, but I think there may be attachment issues at play. I didn't have any more emotional vulnerability left to give. There are a lot of things I avoided and still sometimes (funerals, weddings, holding babies, etc. unless we were biologically related) without really understanding why I went out of my way to avoid them, that I realize are symbolic points of emotional vulnerability in our society. Now I feel a lot more favorable about things like baby showers, weddings, etc.
On the other hand, I used to love pets and now I'm kind of....over them. It may be that parenting just takes too much of my introvert energy though and have nothing to do with attachment style.
I think that makes sense re: pets...an acquaintance once said to me "after you have kids, the dog goes back to just being a dog" ...whereas before the dog is a bit like a surrogate pre-child.
|
|
|
Post by leavethelighton on Sept 5, 2018 0:50:57 GMT
OMG epicgum, a frind of mine said the EXACT same thing (did her name start with an H?) and I refused to believe it. My dogs would always be my babies.
Now they're just...my dogs.
But then I know some people who felt this way and sure enough when their kids left and they were empty nesters, suddenly really adored dogs again.
|
|
|
Post by epicgum on Sept 5, 2018 13:14:13 GMT
OMG epicgum, a frind of mine said the EXACT same thing (did her name start with an H?) and I refused to believe it. My dogs would always be my babies. Now they're just...my dogs. But then I know some people who felt this way and sure enough when their kids left and they were empty nesters, suddenly really adored dogs again. Haha, no....my friends name started with a K
|
|