FA ex reached back out and I'm shocked by her words
Jul 15, 2023 14:37:22 GMT
via mobile
sorgin likes this
Post by Deleted on Jul 15, 2023 14:37:22 GMT
If someone presents this statement as empirical truth:
"I am not a narcissist."
Then empirical evidence supporting this statement should be offered if they expect others in the dialog to accept this statement as empirical truth. If the statment is based upon opinions rendered by clinicians and perhaps themselves, and there is no empirical evidence to support the statement, it ought not be claimed as the One Truth. It's especially hard to have this kind of conversation with an anxious person who admits they are in an emotional place when presenting their arguments.
The DSM which is used to diagnose PD's is a living document and subject to change based on new research. Can a diagnosis or non diagnosis, based on the DSM be claimed as empirical truth, if that truth is subject to change based on empirical research?
"I am not a narcissist."
Then empirical evidence supporting this statement should be offered if they expect others in the dialog to accept this statement as empirical truth. If the statment is based upon opinions rendered by clinicians and perhaps themselves, and there is no empirical evidence to support the statement, it ought not be claimed as the One Truth. It's especially hard to have this kind of conversation with an anxious person who admits they are in an emotional place when presenting their arguments.
The DSM which is used to diagnose PD's is a living document and subject to change based on new research. Can a diagnosis or non diagnosis, based on the DSM be claimed as empirical truth, if that truth is subject to change based on empirical research?
