|
Post by tnr9 on Jun 14, 2018 22:13:55 GMT
I am so very late and it seems there have been a lot of really good points to consider....I am in a class right now where, as part of some of the exercises, we are asked to speak to how we feel and what we experience in our body. The teacher handed out a sheet that has positive emotions on one side and negative emotions on the other...I have never had to use that sheet as I am pretty aware of my emotions at all times...but labeling what is going on in my body is a lot harder. I can go into "central nervous system" overwhelm and won't know it until I start crying without being able to stop. It may explain why I have spacial (not sure I spelled that right) issues...ie not knowing how to recognize when I am too close to another person. This class has been really helpful.
|
|
flic
Full Member
Posts: 119
|
Post by flic on Jun 14, 2018 23:09:15 GMT
Um, sorry to ask but are you referring to me here curious? If so, I'm more than happy for you to call me out or message me directly if I've caused offence or upset you. I was simply trying to provide an alternate view on AP suffering - one i've been exploring theoretically and in therapy and am happy to have refuted! OP seemed to appreciate it so that's all that really matters Personally I feel there is a lot of diversity on the site - apologies if there are rules for people based on length of time on site that I'm not following. Always happy to be enlightened. Apologies if your comment wasn't directed at me - it wasn't clear. All the best! Apologies accepted. Thanks for clearing that up curious. Next time feel free to be direct, rather than passive aggressive. I'd just like to point out that not once have i asked how to win my ex back, even if that is what i wanted when we first broke up. This forum has been a Godsend to me after going through an incredibly traumatic experience of losing my job, home and partner all in one go. I've read posts by your so-called 'regulars' who spent no longer on the site than i now have, and posted as many, if not more, threads asking similar questions to me (some of them specifically asking how to win an ex back). I've read them, and found some of them helpful. I've noticed that many people, when they first come to these boards, are confused about attachment theory and the resulting behaviour - as I was. Most people on these boards seem to honour that, and treat them with respect. You don't have to read my threads, nor anyone elses. My last post made no reference to my ex at all, and was written objectively about the AP experience. It has subsequently resulted in a lively discussion involving many members. It's actually one of the first posts I've felt confident enough to write that talks to some of the theory I've been reading about and learning through therapy. I'm really confused as to what, specifically, you took issue with. To be honest, your comment directed to me made me feel unsafe in the forum. The fact you can't see the hypocrisy of calling someone out in a public space and suggesting their opinions aren't worthy, whilst lamenting a lack of diversity, is troubling. I always find your comments interesting and thought-provoking, and I wish you all the best.
|
|
|
Post by leavethelighton on Jun 15, 2018 1:04:47 GMT
Notalone, thanks for this overall post. A lot of what you wrote about earlier in this thread in terms of the concept of "choice" really resonated with me.
Also I am not sure why people want to censor other people here. If part of someone's process is you need to post or ruminate about your ex 1,000,000 times, fine-- people can choose to respond or not respond.
I do miss the DA's (and others) who recently left en masse but I think on a forum about attachment styles that sort of thing is bound to happen. I'm sure a new diversity of voices will happen over time, and I think we do still have an interesting range of voices.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 15, 2018 1:33:29 GMT
i personally don't mind if people talk about their ex or ruminate, it takes nothing from me --- what i don't like is having my brain picked for insight to a DA ex just because i am DA. i'm not here for that and it is a distraction from my own process and focus. DA here do get targeted for that and i don't mind shutting that down as far as i am concerned. i find it rude actually. i don't want to mind read anybody's ex but sometime will offer a DA perspective on more general topics. just making myself clear on that, and i enjoyed this topic immensely notalone, thanks for posting and all the great contributions.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 15, 2018 6:41:08 GMT
Thanks for clearing that up curious. Next time feel free to be direct, rather than passive aggressive. I'd just like to point out that not once have i asked how to win my ex back, even if that is what i wanted when we first broke up. This forum has been a Godsend to me after going through an incredibly traumatic experience of losing my job, home and partner all in one go. I've read posts by your so-called 'regulars' who spent no longer on the site than i now have, and posted as many, if not more, threads asking similar questions to me (some of them specifically asking how to win an ex back). I've read them, and found some of them helpful. I've noticed that many people, when they first come to these boards, are confused about attachment theory and the resulting behaviour - as I was. Most people on these boards seem to honour that, and treat them with respect. You don't have to read my threads, nor anyone elses. My last post made no reference to my ex at all, and was written objectively about the AP experience. It has subsequently resulted in a lively discussion involving many members. It's actually one of the first posts I've felt confident enough to write that talks to some of the theory I've been reading about and learning through therapy. I'm really confused as to what, specifically, you took issue with. To be honest, your comment directed to me made me feel unsafe in the forum. The fact you can't see the hypocrisy of calling someone out in a public space and suggesting their opinions aren't worthy, whilst lamenting a lack of diversity, is troubling. I always find your comments interesting and thought-provoking, and I wish you all the best. Can you explain to me my "passive-aggressive" attitude towards you?
Kindly provide some evidence to back up your accusation.
I would like to learn how and why so I do not do it in future.
As far as I can remember, I only addressed your posts a handful of times in the past, when you asked about how to build up confidence since you felt shattered and all of my posts recommended resources such as Marisa Peer's method of building self-confidence.
I have not replied to any of your posts since your initial thread, and I have posted on that thread maybe 4 or 5 times about Marisa Peer, and have not "spoken" to you since, so I don't understand why you feel that I have been passive-aggressive towards you.
So please post my replies to you that "took issue" with you, flic.
This site certainly was a lot more diverse and active before but no longer. I believe the more vibrant but kind and courteous exchanges in the past was more desirable, and a diversity of opinions were tolerated. I hope that the civility returns.
|
|
flic
Full Member
Posts: 119
|
Post by flic on Jun 15, 2018 7:00:15 GMT
Thanks for clearing that up curious. Next time feel free to be direct, rather than passive aggressive. I'd just like to point out that not once have i asked how to win my ex back, even if that is what i wanted when we first broke up. This forum has been a Godsend to me after going through an incredibly traumatic experience of losing my job, home and partner all in one go. I've read posts by your so-called 'regulars' who spent no longer on the site than i now have, and posted as many, if not more, threads asking similar questions to me (some of them specifically asking how to win an ex back). I've read them, and found some of them helpful. I've noticed that many people, when they first come to these boards, are confused about attachment theory and the resulting behaviour - as I was. Most people on these boards seem to honour that, and treat them with respect. You don't have to read my threads, nor anyone elses. My last post made no reference to my ex at all, and was written objectively about the AP experience. It has subsequently resulted in a lively discussion involving many members. It's actually one of the first posts I've felt confident enough to write that talks to some of the theory I've been reading about and learning through therapy. I'm really confused as to what, specifically, you took issue with. To be honest, your comment directed to me made me feel unsafe in the forum. The fact you can't see the hypocrisy of calling someone out in a public space and suggesting their opinions aren't worthy, whilst lamenting a lack of diversity, is troubling. I always find your comments interesting and thought-provoking, and I wish you all the best. Can you explain to me my "passive-aggressive" attitude towards you?
Kindly provide some evidence to back up your accusation.
I would like to learn how and why so I do not do it in future.
As far as I can remember, I only addressed your posts a handful of times in the past, when you asked about how to build up confidence since you felt shattered and all of my posts recommended resources such as Marisa Peer's method of building self-confidence.
I have not replied to any of your posts since your initial thread, and I have posted on that thread maybe 4 or 5 times about Marisa Peer, and have not "spoken" to you since, so I don't understand why you feel that I have been passive-aggressive towards you.
So please post my replies to you that "took issue" with you, flic.
This site certainly was a lot more diverse and active before but no longer. I believe the more vibrant but kind and courteous exchanges in the past was more desirable, and a diversity of opinions were tolerated. I hope that the civility returns.
I was simply asking if the post you made earlier on this thread was in reference to me, since you said "the same person" and didn't specify who it was. I took your reply to my post asking whether you meant me ("Apologies accepted"), to mean that it was. Clearly this is not the case given your most recent reply - which is fine, but why didn't you just say so? All the confusion could have been avoided if you'd just addressed the person directly. Using opaque language is passive aggressive, exactly for this reason.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 15, 2018 7:42:32 GMT
Can you explain to me my "passive-aggressive" attitude towards you?
Kindly provide some evidence to back up your accusation.
I would like to learn how and why so I do not do it in future.
As far as I can remember, I only addressed your posts a handful of times in the past, when you asked about how to build up confidence since you felt shattered and all of my posts recommended resources such as Marisa Peer's method of building self-confidence.
I have not replied to any of your posts since your initial thread, and I have posted on that thread maybe 4 or 5 times about Marisa Peer, and have not "spoken" to you since, so I don't understand why you feel that I have been passive-aggressive towards you.
So please post my replies to you that "took issue" with you, flic.
This site certainly was a lot more diverse and active before but no longer. I believe the more vibrant but kind and courteous exchanges in the past was more desirable, and a diversity of opinions were tolerated. I hope that the civility returns.
I was simply asking if the post you made earlier on this thread was in reference to me, since you said "the same person" and didn't specify who it was. I took your reply to my post asking whether you meant me ("Apologies accepted"), to mean that it was. Clearly this is not the case given your most recent reply - which is fine, but why didn't you just say so? All the confusion could have been avoided if you'd just addressed the person directly. Using opaque language is passive aggressive, exactly for this reason. So...I'm truly confused by you and need to get this straight.
It seems, I didn't say anything to you that is "passive aggressive" in any of my past posts to you.
I didn't even refer to you in this thread, flic.
You asked me, out of the blue, if I was being passive-aggressive towards you, when I remarked that the same type of threads kept appearing under different identities of new posters, and you said you would apologize to me if I wasn't.
I asked for you to kindly provide any of my posts to you, past or present, that showed "passive-aggression" towards you, so I would like to know and learn.
It appears you can't find any.
Therefore I said I accept your apology for your allegations without proof.
Somehow you are still accusing me of using "opaque language".
I hope this is now cleared up.
|
|
flic
Full Member
Posts: 119
|
Post by flic on Jun 15, 2018 9:09:41 GMT
I was simply asking if the post you made earlier on this thread was in reference to me, since you said "the same person" and didn't specify who it was. I took your reply to my post asking whether you meant me ("Apologies accepted"), to mean that it was. Clearly this is not the case given your most recent reply - which is fine, but why didn't you just say so? All the confusion could have been avoided if you'd just addressed the person directly. Using opaque language is passive aggressive, exactly for this reason. So...I'm truly confused by you and need to get this straight.
It seems, I didn't say anything to you that is "passive aggressive" in any of my past posts to you.
I didn't even refer to you in this thread, flic.
You asked me, out of the blue, if I was being passive-aggressive towards you, when I remarked that the same type of threads kept appearing under different identities of new posters, and you said you would apologize to me if I wasn't.
I asked for you to kindly provide any of my posts to you, past or present, that showed "passive-aggression" towards you, so I would like to know and learn.
It appears you can't find any.
Therefore I said I accept your apology for your allegations without proof.
Somehow you are still accusing me of using "opaque language".
I hope this is now cleared up.
I'm as confused as you. Your original post reads "It feels to me as if the same questions are posted by the same person in different threads over and over, in a very controlled manner. The site has changed so much, has become one-directional, and lost its diversity." It comes directly after a post i made that was provocative. I simply asked if that was directed at me. Ie, did you mean me when you said "the same person" - singular. That was, and remains my question, not whether you were being passive aggressive to me, but were you referring to me. Which you still haven't answered. The fact you don't seem willing to say who you were referring to, but feel ok posting that comment, followed by one calling out the initials of mine and several other people's exes, well, here's the dictionary definition of passive aggressive, maybe you are unclear what it means: of or denoting a type of behaviour or personality characterized by indirect resistance to the expectations of others and an avoidance of direct confrontation.I think that definitely clears it up for me.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 15, 2018 11:11:36 GMT
I'm as confused as you. Your original post reads "It feels to me as if the same questions are posted by the same person in different threads over and over, in a very controlled manner. The site has changed so much, has become one-directional, and lost its diversity." It comes directly after a post i made that was provocative. I simply asked if that was directed at me. Ie, did you mean me when you said "the same person" - singular. That was, and remains my question, not whether you were being passive aggressive to me, but were you referring to me. Which you still haven't answered. The fact you don't seem willing to say who you were referring to, but feel ok posting that comment, followed by one calling out the initials of mine and several other people's exes, well, here's the dictionary definition of passive aggressive, maybe you are unclear what it means: of or denoting a type of behaviour or personality characterized by indirect resistance to the expectations of others and an avoidance of direct confrontation.I think that definitely clears it up for me. Yes, it reads like many posts and threads were started by the same person, the themes, the terms, the situations, the words, they repeat, and rhyme, over and over, even though they are by different identities, and even different attachment styles. There is an echo chamber effect that is bizarre.
It used to be we are free to express our opinions or impressions, but not any more.
For example, I remarked that I see repetitive threads seemingly by the same poster under different identities, it is my impression, and I hope we are all free to express our impression of the site, especially as many have done so in the past.
Why do you think it is specifically targeted at you, you are not guilty of this, right? I am certain it is not you.
If you notice, you still have not let it go after I described the play by play which led to a simple "Apology accepted", which led to even more "are you being passive-aggressive to me" posts from you, including a dictionary definition.
Now, this is my own observation.
The site was quite straight forward before, all the posters I have known had distinct identities, distinct stories, distinct opinions, and suddenly, it felt as if there was a disruption. There was bona fide exchange before, we all question and answer each other in good faith, without games or manipulation, being sympathetic to one another's issues and situations, generously welcoming to all. The purpose of this site is I believe geared to help answer attachment questions for everyone sincere in seeking answers. The mass exodus of not only DAs I've known by "name", but also Secures, FAs and APs really left a vacuum.
I hope they return some day.
Most certainly, I have never posted under any identities except my own, and most definitely, most of us wish to avoid those who are looking for other purposes or engaging in futile, repetitive interactions, or false impressions of "consensus". Many of us take the trouble to read carefully one another's stories, reflect, research, give thoughtful answers, and we wish to direct our efforts towards a fruitful outcome. The genuine diversity is what makes this group wisdom valuable.
This is an open public resource on attachment styles, there aren't many out there, it would be a shame if the forum were to be disrupted, members leaving, etc. I'm sure you do agree, since you care a lot like I do that the forum continues to serve its community well, and join me in hoping that the diversity returns.
|
|
flic
Full Member
Posts: 119
|
Post by flic on Jun 15, 2018 11:12:28 GMT
Meanwhile, I'm well into Waking The Tiger now - by Peter Levine, the founder of SE therapy. Well worth the read! goldilocks and juniper the way he talks about healing trauma sounds very similar to both your way of describing it (blocks of ice or knots of veins) and with how you were able to release your emotions and pain. It's so inspiring to hear from people who have successfully moved to secure. I've realised that the idea of 'focusing on the self' - literally means focusing in as specifically as possible - on the body, the feelings, the sensations, the emotions. When you do that, there's no room for thinking about the 'other', because they don't exist.
|
|
|
Post by tnr9 on Jun 15, 2018 11:18:30 GMT
I was going to add flic that I think for so many decades, I was unaware (aka I did not care about) of my body or the signals it was providing and I think perhaps that was anther from of "self rejection" tha Jeb and others mention as a key aspect of being AP. I amcurious if going though SE has also changed the way you approach eating? I have recently discovered that I would eat to quell feelings of anxiety when my stomache was actually content and not hungry. Just an interesting discovery I wanted to share.
|
|
flic
Full Member
Posts: 119
|
Post by flic on Jun 15, 2018 11:27:18 GMT
@curious - Ok, that makes sense. It really does. I understand why you feel like that if that is what is happening - I don't know if people are posting under different names, I'd just assumed everyone was a distinct person because it seems weird that they wouldn't be. As you know, i'm fairly new to this thing, so i had no idea there might be such politics at play. I'm sorry I jumped to conclusions and assumed you were talking about me - I had someone else message me because they were a little upset by my post about whether APs put themselves in situations where they will suffer, so I made an assumption I'd triggered you too, especially when you didn't dispute whether you were talking about me or not. Again, I apologise - I really was just after a yes or no answer. And I'm sorry if my own threads have seemed repetitive to you - I've tried to post only in Support for APs when they are personal and I'm feeling down and ruminating - to me that feels like a safe space to do so. I think everyone on these boards has their own journey - many start with a personal issue with specific questions and move towards helping other newer members with theirs as they gain more knowledge overall. I feel I'm starting to move towards the latter as I learn more and experience shifts through therapy and other work on myself. Perhaps as myself and other newer members do this, it will help increase the diversity and range of topics. Here's to an open, diverse and welcoming community - with some healthy debate and disagreement!
|
|
|
Post by tnr9 on Jun 15, 2018 11:30:07 GMT
|
|
|
Post by ocarina on Jun 15, 2018 11:33:15 GMT
I am as usual blissfully unaware of most of what has caused the upset on this thread - apologies if my ill thought out comments about suffering being a choice were part of the problem.
Has anyone read The Five Agreements? It's a great concept - to live a good life:
1.Be impeccable with your word
2. Don't take anything personally
3.Don't make assumptions
4. Always do your best
Fear I broke the first one on my glib comments and sorry again for any hurt - I also assumed that it was one particular poster who was being referred to by Curious - in fact I thought it could be me, I think it was a matter of semantics and in the written word difficult to tell if it was directed at one person or at the general tone of discussion - so maybe I am also guilty of numbers 2 and 3....!
I do think there's an interesting discussion at the root of this - about the different ways humans process and act upon emotions and how making changes in these areas can enhance quality of life.
I am battling on with number 4 now - I hope everyone has a peaceful weekend!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 15, 2018 11:42:22 GMT
Respect to OP?
can we keep this on the topic posted by the OP? Please?
mixed styles were having a great discussion about pain.
|
|